MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2021546179 · doi:10.1139/p01-015

Vibrational dependence of the torsional tunneling splitting and the <i>a</i> to <i>b</i> intensity evolution in the OH overtone spectra of CH<sub>3</sub>OH

2001· article· en· W2021546179 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
M. Abbouti Temsamani, Li‐Hong Xu, David S. Perry

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Laser Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsOvertoneAb initioBasis setAtomic physicsDipoleAb initio quantum chemistry methodsMolecular physicsSpectral lineMoleculeQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An ab initio investigation of the OH-stretching overtone of methanol is presented aimed at interpretation of two of the interesting features reported in recent supersonic-jet infrared-laser-assisted photofragment spectroscopy (IRLAPS) studies, namely, (i) a monotonic decrease of the torsional E – A splitting as υOH increases, (ii) an evolution of the a-type transition moment towards dominance at higher excitations of the OH-stretching vibration. At the MP2 level with a 6-311+G(3df,2p) basis set, one-dimensional functions for the potential energy, dipole moment (a and b directions), barrier height V3, and torsional constant F have been mapped out as a function of the OH-bond length with the remaining structure relaxed. All ab initio quantities have been expressed as Taylor-series expansions in the dimensionless OH normal coordinate, q. Calculations have been carried out in the harmonic basis set to yield vibrational energies and eigenfunctions. The latter have been used to evaluate the torsional parameters (V3, F) and the resulting E – A torsional splittings at each OH excitation, and to compute the evolution of the infrared transition intensity ratio [Formula: see text]a/b. The ab initio results reproduce the reported decrease in E – A splitting by a factor of 5 in going from υOH = 0 to υOH = 6, with a maximum deviation of 19% at the highest excitation. The calculated variation in [Formula: see text]a/b is in qualitative agreement with the experimental trend, showing the observed sharp rise at high υOH. PACS Nos.: 33.20E, 33.80B

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2001
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Physics→Same topicSpectroscopy and Laser Applications→French-language works237,207→