MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021553424 · doi:10.1063/1.4758184

Conservation laws of surfactant transport equations

2012· article· en· W2021553424 on OpenAlexaff
Christina Kallendorf, Alexei F. Cheviakov, Martin Oberlack, Yongqi Wang

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Thin Films
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersTechnische Universität Darmstadt
KeywordsPhysicsConservation lawConvection–diffusion equationConvectionMechanicsContext (archaeology)Domain (mathematical analysis)DiffusionClassical mechanicsFlow (mathematics)ThermodynamicsMathematical analysisMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Equations of the interfacial convection and convection-diffusion describing the transport of surfactants, and more general interfacial balance laws, in the context of a three-dimensional incompressible two-phase flow are considered. Here, the interface is represented implicitly by a zero level set of an appropriate function. All interfacial quantities and operators are extended from the interface to the three-dimensional domain. In both convection and convection-diffusion settings, infinite families of conservation laws that essentially involve surfactant concentration are derived, using the direct construction method. The obtained results are also applicable to the construction of the general balance laws for other excess surface physical quantities. The system of governing equations is subsequently rewritten in a fully conserved form in the three-dimensional domain. The latter is essential for simulations using modern numerical methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of FluidsSame topicFluid Dynamics and Thin FilmsFrench-language works237,207