MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021554514 · doi:10.4021//jmc.v2i1.121

Emphysematous Pyelonephritis in a Patient With Hyperosmolar Hyperglycemic Syndrome

2011· article· en· W2021554514 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hidekatsu Yanai, Keisuke Sekine

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Cases · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfectious Disease Case Reports and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLeukocytosisNephrectomyUrinalysisAbdominal painUrinary systemDiabetes mellitusAntibioticsInternal medicineGastroenterologySurgeryUrologyKidneyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 61-year-old woman presented with abdominal and back pain, and disturbed consciousness. Laboratory data showed hyperglycemia (plasma glucose 448 mg/dl), leukocytosis, thrombocytopenia, renal failure, and extremely increased serum C-reactive protein level. Urinalysis revealed no ketone bodies, and numerous bacteria and leukocytes. These symptoms and data suggested the presence of diabetic hyperosmolar hyperglycemic syndrome and urinary tract infection. Computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen showed the presence of gas in the renal area with extensive renal parenchymal destruction, indicating the diagnosis of emphysematous pyelonephritis, which is a rare but severe disease with a morality rate that can be as high as 70%. Early diagnosis by abdominal CT and early intensive therapy using intensive insulin therapy, antibiotics, and selective nephrectomy saved her life. doi:10.4021/jmc121w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical CasesSame topicInfectious Disease Case Reports and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207