Dexamethasone reduces pain after tonsillectomy in adults
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the effect of a course of dexamethasone on postoperative pain and morbidity after adult tonsillectomy. We report the results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of 200 adult patients undergoing elective tonsillectomy. Patients were randomized to three groups: one group received the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug piroxicam for 8 days postoperatively, one group received dexamethasone for the same period and the third group received both drugs. Patients recorded their pain scores and analgesic requirements daily for 10 days. Patients treated with a combination of piroxicam and dexamethasone recorded consistently lower pain scores than those treated with either drug alone. This difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05) on all days except the day of surgery and the second postoperative day. Patients treated with piroxicam alone had significantly higher analgesic requirements than in either of the other groups. Dexamethasone given in this regime reduces postoperative pain and analgesic requirements after adult tonsillectomy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".