Design optimization of floating breakwaters with an interdisciplinary fluid–solid structural problem
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The design optimization of floating breakwaters implicates solving an interdisciplinary problem consisting of three models. The first one arises from the interaction of linear waves with a moored floating breakwater with a leeward boundary that is composed of a vertical sidewall representing the quay wall in ports. The second covers the dynamical behaviour of the oscillating structure caused by the incoming waves. These two assemble the hydrodynamic performance of the floating breakwater; while the third concerns its structural mechanics subject to hydrostatic and hydrodynamic forces. The goal of the optimization problem is to design an optimal floating breakwater that can attenuate the waves to the minimum height inside the port and fulfill several constraints related to floating, stability, and structural resistance. The objective function and constraints are expressed in terms of geometrical parameters of the breakwater as mathematical expressions assembled in an optimization algorithm based on the sequential quadratic programming method (SQP). This yields to several optimal structures each corresponding to a specified wave period. Finally, an analysis is performed to determine an optimum structure for a wide range of frequencies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it