Does calcitriol have actions independent from the vitamin D receptor in maintaining skeletal and mineral homeostasis?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Although the active metabolite of vitamin D, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)2D), is classically appreciated to exert its calcemic and other actions via interaction with the vitamin D receptor, thereby modulating gene transcription, some of its actions cannot be explained in this way when examined in vitro. RECENT FINDINGS: Comparison of mouse models deleted for either the 25-hydroxyvitamin D-1alpha-hydroxylase enzyme (deficient in 1,25(OH)2D) or the vitamin D receptor or both has allowed an assessment of whether 1,25(OH)2D can function in the absence of the vitamin D receptor in vivo. The data indicated that calcium absorption required both the ligand and the receptor as did bone and cartilage remodeling. However, with respect to parathyroid gland function and development of the cartilaginous growth plate, calcium and 1,25(OH)2D acted cooperatively and there was evidence that 1,25(OH)2D could act independently of the vitamin D receptor. SUMMARY: Results from the genetic models are consistent with recent reports that rapid actions of vitamin D metabolites occur in chondrocytes through a membrane receptor distinct from the vitamin D receptor. In addition, in osteoblasts it has been proposed that the vitamin D receptor localized in plasma membrane caveolae signals the rapid effects of the active vitamin D secosterol.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".