On the Capacity Region of the Broadcast, the Interference, and the Cognitive Radio Channels
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As the main basic building blocks of the interference networks, in this paper the broadcast channel, the classical interference channel (CIC), and the cognitive radio channel (CRC) are considered. New capacity outer bounds are established for these channels. These outer bounds are all derived based on a novel unified framework. Using the derived outer bounds, some new capacity results are proved for the CIC and the CRC; a mixed interference regime is identified for the two-user CIC, where decoding interference at one receiver and treating interference as noise at the other one is sum-rate optimal. In addition, a noisy interference regime is derived for the one-sided CIC. Our new capacity theorems for the CIC contain the previously obtained results regarding the Gaussian channel as special cases. For the CRC, a full characterization of the capacity region for a class of more-capable channels is derived. Moreover, it is shown that the derived outer bounds are useful to study channels with one-sided receiver side information wherein one of the receivers has access to the nonintended message; capacity bounds are also discussed in details for such scenarios. Our results lead to new insights regarding the nature of information flow in the basic interference networks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it