MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021641264 · doi:10.1179/174327506x113037

Petrochemical discrimination of evolved granitic intrusions associated with Mount Pleasant deposits, New Brunswick, Canada

2006· article· en· W2021641264 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Carlos Inverno, R. W. Hutchinson

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Earth Science Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy Section B · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFogarty International CenterUniversidade de LisboaColorado School of Mines
KeywordsGeologyGeochemistryBrecciaRhyoliteCalderaPorphyriticVolcanic rockDevonianSedimentary rockIgneous rockPhenocrystVolcanoQuartzPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Mount Pleasant Sn–W–Mo–Bi–In base metal deposits that are spatially and temporarily related to multiple, Late Devonian granitic intrusions are located in southern New Brunswick, Canada. Regional rocks include a sequence of Ordovician–Silurian detrital rocks, with minor interbedded volcanic rocks, which were deformed in the Devonian Acadian orogeny. The Mount Pleasant subvolcanic–eruptive complex underlies part of a 17 × 12 km caldera which constitutes a sequence of Upper Devonian volcanic and sedimentary rocks, intruded by subvolcanic–plutonic rocks (e.g. the Mount Pleasant intrusions). Brittle deformation affected the rocks within parts of the caldera.At the Mount Pleasant, along the southwestern margin of this caldera, two mineralised zones, termed the Fire Tower Zone and the North Zone, occur within volcanic necks about 1 km apart. In both zones, multiple, successive Late Devonian granitic intrusions were emplaced into interbedded rhyolitic tuffs/sedimentary breccias overlain by rhyodacitic lavas. The volcanic necks are defined by magmatic–hydrothermal breccias. In the Fire Tower Zone, fine grained granite, granite porphyry and porphyritic granite were emplaced successively. The first is associated with porphyry type W–Mo–Bi–In mineralisation. Three successive generations of granitic intrusions (known as granites I, II and III) also occur in the North Zone. Here, similar but less expressive mineralisation occurs in granite I whereas the others are associated with several significant tin deposits.In both zones, the granitic rocks are pale, porphyritic, generally fine grained, biotitic, contain micrographic intergrowths of K-feldspar and quartz in K-feldspar phenocrysts, and are modally of alkaline-feldspar type. The granitic intrusions may be classified as crustal A-type, with intraplate, high heat production and peraluminous characteristics that are typical of a continental rift environment. Petrographic and geochemical evidence suggests that they formed under conditions of fluid saturation and undercooling. Incompatible and immobile trace element and elemental ratio data indicate that they are highly evolved tin bearing granites with a higher tin potential in the North Zone than in the Fire Tower Zone. There is no solid evidence for petrochemical equivalence between individual granites from these two zones.The endogranitic tin zone is an irregular, almost tabular, 400 m long body enclosed in granite II. The form and petrographic, mineralogical and chemical evidence as well as metal zoning show that the endogranitic tin zone is hosted in a distinct phase of granite, termed the endogranitic tin zone granite. Based on chemical data from thirty North Zone granite samples, but including only one sample from the endogranitic tin zone granite, incompatible (and immobile) trace element evidence indicates that granite III is more evolved and has a higher tin potential than granite II, and only suggests that the highest potential for tin may be found in a probable late differentiate of granite III, the endogranitic tin zone granite, which would have intruded the highest portions of granite III and extended upward into granite II. The exploration significance of this is that important targets for tin mineralisation are deep portions of granite II close to granite III, where possible differentiates of the latter might have intruded the former.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.771
Threshold uncertainty score0.496

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Earth Science Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy Section BSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207