MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021655956 · doi:10.1364/ol.39.002097

Diffuse photon density wavefront speed as a contrast for tomographic imaging of heterogeneous diffusive media

2014· article· en· W2021655956 on OpenAlexaff
Julien Pichette, Simon Boucher, George Bouza Domínguez, Yves Bérubé-Lauzière

Bibliographic record

VenueOptics Letters · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWavefrontInverse problemOpticsContrast (vision)Tomographic reconstructionDiffuse optical imagingPhotonPhysicsTomographyInverseIterative reconstructionPhoton countingAlgorithmComputer scienceMathematicsMathematical analysisComputer visionGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An imaging algorithm is implemented for tomographically reconstructing contrast maps of the space variant speed of diffuse photon density wavefronts (DPDWFs) propagating in biological tissue-like diffusing media. This speed serves as a novel contrast not previously exploited in the literature. The algorithm employs early photon arrival times (EPATs) extracted from a set of time domain measurements. A relationship between EPATs and the speed of DPDWFs is exploited as the forward model. The forward model and its use in an inverse problem are supported by experimental results. These are carried out for 3D media with tissue-like optical properties. The resulting inverse problem is formulated as a set of algebraic equations and solved within a constrained linear least squares framework. The results indicate that the algorithm provides tomographic information on heterogeneities locations and distributions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.810

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptics LettersSame topicOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207