MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021694666 · doi:10.1002/zaac.201000202

Using Taguchi Robust Design Method to Develop an Optimized Synthesis Procedure for Nanocrystals of ZSM‐5 Zeolite

2010· article· en· W2021694666 on OpenAlexaff
Maryam Abrishamkar, Seyed Naser Azizi, Hossein Kazemian

Bibliographic record

VenueZeitschrift für anorganische und allgemeine Chemie · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicZeolite Catalysis and Synthesis
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTaguchi methodsZeoliteCrystallizationMaterials scienceNanocrystalOrthogonal arrayScanning electron microscopeZSM-5DiffractionChemical engineeringSpectroscopyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)NanotechnologyComposite materialChromatographyChemistryCatalysisOpticsOrganic chemistryEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The effects of TPAOH/SiO2, H2O/SiO2, SiO2/Na2O and SiO2/Al2O3 ratios in the initial synthetic mixture on the crystallization of nanoparticles of ZSM‐5 zeolite under atmospheric pressure were studied. A Taguchi orthogonal experimental design with three levels of the above‐mentioned parameters was used to optimize the experiment parameters by the analysis of variances (ANOVA). Applying the Taguchi method significantly reduced the time and cost for optimization. The obtained products were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, X‐ray diffraction and FT‐IR spectroscopy. As a result of the Taguchi analysis TPAOH/SiO2 followed by SiO2/Al2O3 was the most influencing parameters for the synthesis of nanosized ZSM‐5 crystals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZeitschrift für anorganische und allgemeine ChemieSame topicZeolite Catalysis and SynthesisFrench-language works237,207