MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021712730 · doi:10.1063/1.1804815

Irradiator to study damage induced to large nonvolatile molecules by low-energy electrons

2004· article· en· W2021712730 on OpenAlexaff
Yi Zheng, Pierre Cloutier, J. Richard Wagner, Léon Sanche

Bibliographic record

VenueReview of Scientific Instruments · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicX-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceElectronIrradiationMoleculeFragmentation (computing)Electron beam processingAtomic physicsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)OptoelectronicsChemistryOrganic chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report on the design and performance of an irradiator to study the fragmentation of large nonvolatile molecules induced by low-energy electron impact under ultrahigh vacuum. The apparatus consists essentially of a new type of electron gun which can bombard molecules spin-coated on the inside surface of a cylinder. With this configuration, it is possible to irradiate a relatively large area (26 cm2) of a solid molecular film and thus, produce a sufficient amount of degraded material for subsequent analysis, outside vacuum, of the compounds remaining on the inner surface of the cylinder. The electron energy is tunable from 3 to 130±0.5 eV and the current density adjustable up to 2.6±0.5×1012 electron s−1 cm−2, respectively. Choosing thymidine as a model system for deoxyribose nucleic acid damage, we show that nonvolatile fragments produced by 5–100 eV electron irradiation can be characterized by high-pressure liquid chromatography/ultraviolet detector and gas chromatography/mass spectroscopy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReview of Scientific InstrumentsSame topicX-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence AnalysisFrench-language works237,207