Ultrasound-Based Characterization of Prostate Cancer Using Joint Independent Component Analysis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This paper presents the results of a new approach for selection of RF time series features based on joint independent component analysis for in vivo characterization of prostate cancer. METHODS: We project three sets of RF time series features extracted from the spectrum, fractal dimension, and the wavelet transform of the ultrasound RF data on a space spanned by five joint independent components. Then, we demonstrate that the obtained mixing coefficients from a group of patients can be used to train a classifier, which can be applied to characterize cancerous regions of a test patient. RESULTS: In a leave-one-patient-out cross validation, an area under receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.93 and classification accuracy of 84% are achieved. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound RF time series can be used to accurately characterize prostate cancer, in vivo without the need for exhaustive search in the feature space. SIGNIFICANCE: We use joint independent component analysis for systematic fusion of multiple sets of RF time series features, within a machine learning framework, to characterize PCa in an in vivo study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it