MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Ca-Rich Corner of the Al-Ca-Zn System

2011· article· en· W2021791447 on OpenAlexafffund
Shabnam Konica, Yi Nan Zhang, Dmytro Kevorkov, Mamoun Medraj

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced materials research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGeneral Motors of Canada
KeywordsIsothermal processTernary operationSolubilityElectron probe microanalysisTernary numeral systemAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Materials scienceDiffractionPhase (matter)Solid solutionPhase diagramHomogeneity (statistics)CrystallographyChemistryElectron microprobeThermodynamicsMetallurgyPhysical chemistryPhysicsChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, the partial isothermal section of the Al-Ca-Zn system in the region between 33.3 and 100 at.% Ca has been investigated at 350°C using key alloys. The actual composition of the alloys is measured by inductively coupled plasma technique. Phase relations and solubility limits of the binary and ternary compounds have been determined by means of electron probe microanalysis and X-ray diffraction. In the current work, a new ternary compound has been identified in this region with the Al9Ca31Zn10 (IM1) composition. Binary compound Al14Ca13 (IM2) has an extended solid solubility into the ternary system. The homogeneity ranges of the Al2Ca, the MgNi2-type C36 phase Al2-xCaZnx (0.28≤x≤0.70) (IM3) at 350°C and CaZn2 compounds in the pseudobinary Al2Ca-CaZn2 section have been determined at 350°C and the results are combined with the literature to construct the partial vertical Al2Ca-CaZn2 section and partial isothermal Al-Ca-Zn section at 350°C.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced materials researchSame topicAluminum Alloy Microstructure PropertiesFrench-language works237,207