MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Participation in Corporate University Training: Its Effect on Individual Job Performance

2004· article· en· W2021809888 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicHuman Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopularityJob performanceTraining (meteorology)ManagementPsychologyBusiness administrationBusinessJob satisfactionEconomicsSocial psychologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This study investigates the effect of corporate university training on employees' job performance. The popularity of this strategic training approach has grown considerably in both North America and Europe over the last decade; however, no scientific research known by the authors has evaluated the effectiveness of corporate university training on work‐related outcomes. Using a data set of 1,484 employee observations from a Canadian financial institution's computerized personnel files, results from a regression analysis reveal that participation in corporate university training had a relatively small effect on individual job performance after controlling for pre‐training job performance as well as job and individual characteristics. Furthermore, this finding indicates a positive linear relationship between the number of corporate university training courses completed and job performance. Results also show a significant interactive effect of corporate university training and pre‐training job performance on post‐training individual job performance. We discuss theoretical and practical implications as well as limitations and suggestions for future research. Résumé La recherche qui suit est une enquête sur l'impact de la formation de l'université d'entreprise sur la performance des employés. Au cours de la dernière décennie, cette approche stratégique du développement des compétences a connu un succès remarquable en Amérique du Nord et en Europe. Pourtant, à notre connaissance, aucune recherche scientifique n'en évalue l'efficacité sur les indicateurs de la performance au travail. En appliquant l'analyse de régression à 1 484 observations d'employés provenant d'un fichier informatique d'une grande institution bancaire canadienne, l'étude révèle que par rapport à la performance pré‐formation et aux caractéristiques individuelles, la participation à un programme d'université d'entreprise a un impact relativement faible sur la performance individuelle. Les résultats indiquent également qu'il existe une relation linéaire positive entre le nombre de cours complétés avec succès et la performance individuelle. Par ailleurs, l'université d'entreprise et la performance pré‐formation ont un effet interactif remarquable sur la performance individuelle post‐formation. Pour finir, Varticle examine les implications théoriques et pratiques de l'étude, passe en revue ses limites avant de proposer des pistes de recherche future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.414
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.257
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.114 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it