MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021812614 · doi:10.1109/icmse.2013.6586547

Study on the monthly and seasonal variation characteristics of passenger volume of Pingdingshan City public transport

2013· article· en· W2021812614 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Feng-hua Chang, Lili Fan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTransportation Planning and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeasonalityPublic transportQuarter (Canadian coin)Trough (economics)Index (typography)Passenger transportEnvironmental scienceGeographyVolume (thermodynamics)Variation (astronomy)MeteorologyTransport engineeringStatisticsComputer scienceEngineeringMathematicsEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Monthly and seasonal variation characteristics of passenger volume of urban public transport can provide an important basis for the rational planning and operation of public transport. According to the passenger volume information of the public transport of Pingdingshan City, this paper, using Excel, calculates the monthly seasonal index, and then processes them with one-way analysis of variance in three seasonal division patterns respectively. The conclusions show that there are obvious monthly and seasonal variation in this city's passenger volume of public transport: the peak months are March, January, February and April, and that the trough months are July, August, June and September. The most significant seasonal differences appear in the mode of four quarter, among which the first quarter is the peak seasona and the third quarter is the trough season. The variation characteristics is the result of the influence ofclimate, holidaysand service condition. Finally, the paper puts forward the countermeasures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTransportation Planning and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207