Wave Field of Porous Medium Saturated by Two Immiscible Fluids Under Excitation of Multiple Wave Sources
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wave propagation in porous medium saturated by immiscible fluids has received significant interests from the researchers in searching for comprehensively understanding the behavior of underground motion such as seismic wave propagation and artificial vibration in oil or gas reservoirs. In this research, the wave field of a porous medium saturated by two immiscible fluids is investigated. The elastic domain considered is excited by multiple cylindrical energy sources. The wave field of the whole domain with the excitation of several fast compressible waves in low frequency range is considered. Polar coordinates are utilized for the need of describing the multi-energy sources, so that the propagating waves can be expressed with the utilization of Hankel function. A moving-coordinate method is employed to study the coupling of multiple waves. The combined effects from several sources on the wave propagation are investigated and comparison with that of a single phase fluid is also addressed. With the employment of the methodology established, the wave field at any desired domain considered can be quantitatively determined in terms of wave propagation, frequencies and amplitudes of the source waves. To demonstrate the implementation of the model developed in this research, a numerical simulation is provided. The results of this research contribute to the comprehension of liquids and solid interaction under the excitation of waves, such as seismic, electromagnetic and other artificial vibrations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".