MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021874757 · doi:10.1353/jmh.2005.0043

Paths of Glory: The French Army, 1914-18 (review)

2005· article· en· W2021874757 on OpenAlex
Roy A. Prete

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Military History · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWorld Wars: History, Literature, and Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGloryHistoryAncient historyPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Paths of Glory: The French Army, 1914–18 Roy A. Prete Paths of Glory: The French Army, 1914–18. By Anthony Clayton. London: Cassell, 2003. ISBN 0-304-35949-1. Maps. Photographs. Appendixes. Bibliographical essay. Index. Pp. 238. £20.00. Anthony Clayton, Senior Lecturer at the Royal Military Academy, Sandhurst, from 1965 to 1994, has enriched our knowledge of several fields of military history, particularly British and French colonial history, and has added to his list of metropolitan studies in his most recent book, Paths of Glory: The French Army 1914-18. This very readable volume appraises the performance of the French Army at the field level and follows its evolution, based on the most recent British and French sources. Written for the student of military history and informed general reader, the book serves as a corrective to many British accounts which give the impression that the British Army was the main army in the field on the western front in World War I and carried the brunt of the fighting throughout the war. It also corrects the skewed vision of the performance of the French Army in the Great War, as seen in light of the debacle of 1940. As Clayton notes, the French Army, though initially ill-equipped, ill-armed, and badly trained in modern tactics, nevertheless bore the brunt of the fighting through to 1917, and, after the mutinies of 1917, under the superlative leadership of two remarkable soldiers, Philippe Pétain and Ferdinand Foch, went on to play a decisive role in the final victory. Clayton is particularly interested in the appraisal of French morale at the various stages of the war and shows that, even after the renewal of fighting spirit at the end of 1917, morale in 1918 was variable, which contributed significantly to the French soldiers' sense of isolement, or isolation, from the [End Page 249] rest of French society. That tradition, continuing to World War II, was a cause of defeat in 1940. Also of interest to Clayton is the significant development of trench weaponry, improved artillery, new registering techniques and other more feted innovations such as tanks and airplanes, showing that World War I, especially in its later stages, was anything but technologically stagnant. He finds in Pétain's successive directives the foundation for the modernization of the French Army. All of the horrors of trench warfare, including mud, lice, rats, rotting corpses, heat and frost, lack of sleep, and often food and water, and horrendous fear under shell fire, are detailed. After the mutinies of 1917 the French Army, which traditionally took less good care of its men than the British Army, also began under Pétain to improve the living conditions of the French poilus and, as a measure of raising morale, granted regular leaves, which, however, were withdrawn from time to time during the campaigns of 1918 under Foch. The academic scholar might object that Clayton has not included a scholarly apparatus which footnotes his findings. Rather, he has written a substantive bibliographical essay, which evaluates recent key works in French and English, a helpful aid to the general reader and scholar alike. While the treatment of both the preparation of the French Army and its involvement in the campaigns of successive years is generally well handled, there is minimal coverage of the political-military environment which underpins French grand strategy. And the treatment of 1915 falls somewhat short in its appraisal of the strategy of Joseph Joffre, who, despite what he told the British, was still seeking a breakthrough in his great spring and fall offensives. Overall, the author provides a convincing demonstration of the essential contribution of the French Army— in the words of Winston Churchill, "that sorely tried, glorious Army upon whose sacrifices the liberties of Europe had through three fearful campaigns mainly depended" (p. v). Clayton's volume is also the first comprehensive synthesis in English of the history of the French Army in World War I and, as such, will be helpful to the scholar, and of particular interest to the military history student and general reader. Roy A. Prete Royal Military College of Canada, Kingston, Ontario, Canada Copyright © 2005...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.495
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it