The Postexercise Increase in the Threshold for Cutaneous Vasodilation and Sweating is Not Observed With Extended Recovery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The following study was conducted to evaluate the hypothesis that an increase in the postexercise onset threshold for cutaneous vasodilation (Th(VD)) and sweating (Th(SW)) would not be observed upon the restoration of baseline mean arterial pressure (MAP). Subjects remained either seated resting for 15 min or performed 15 min of treadmill running at 70% VO2peak followed by either 20- (short) or 60-min (extended) recovery. At the end of each recovery protocol (20 and 60 min) a water perfusion suit was then used to increase mean skin temperature until Th(VD) and Th(SW) was noted. Exercise resulted in an increase in Th(VD) and Th(SW) of 0.24 +/- 0.03 and 0.24 +/- 0.02 degrees C, respectively, above no-exercise for the short recovery (p < 0.05). No increase was measured for the extended recovery. Postexercise MAP was significantly reduced prior to whole-body warming for the short recovery whereas no reduction was measured for the extended recovery. The increase in Th(VD) and Th(SW), measured during the early stages of recovery, is reversed with the reestablishment of baseline MAP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".