MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021895471 · doi:10.1080/07924259.2003.9652559

Effects of sex steroids on<i>in vitro</i>gamete release in the sea scallop,<i>Placopecten magellanicus</i>

2003· article· en· W2021895471 on OpenAlexafffund
Chunde Wang, Roger P. Croll

Bibliographic record

VenueInvertebrate Reproduction & Development · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMarine Biology and Environmental Chemistry
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersDalhousie University
KeywordsGameteBiologyScallopInternal medicineEndocrinologyCycloheximideTestosterone (patch)SpermGametogenesisReceptorEndocrine systemHormoneEcologyFisheryBotanyProtein biosynthesisEmbryogenesisBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Effects of estradiol, testosterone and progesterone on 5-HT-induced gamete release were studied in vitro in both sexes of the sea scallop. The results showed that estradiol (10−5–10−8 M in females and 10−5–10−7 M in males) and progesterone (10−7–10−8 M in females and 10−5–10−7 M in males) potentiated gamete release in both sexes, whereas testosterone (10−5–10−7 M) had a facilitatory effect only in males. Pharmacological studies suggested that these effects may be achieved through activation of sex steroid receptors because they were abolished by receptor antagonists (tamoxifen, 1.25 μM; flutamine, 2.5 μM; RU486, 1 μM) and by RNA and protein synthesis inhibitors (actinomycin D, 8 μM; cycloheximide, 10 μM). These findings support a growing body of literature which suggests physiological roles of sex steroids in invertebrates. Furthermore, the results also suggest possible applications in the environmental monitoring of endocrine disrupting chemicals and in bivalve aquaculture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.172
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations58
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInvertebrate Reproduction & DevelopmentSame topicMarine Biology and Environmental ChemistryFrench-language works237,207