MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2021921426 · doi:10.1139/f99-263

Stock-recruitment relationships for life cycles that exhibit concurrent density dependence

2000· article· en· W2021921426 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Eric P. Bjorkstedt

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine and fisheries research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStock (firearms)Density dependenceFish migrationEconometricsCovariateBiologyEcologyFish stockStatistical physicsEconomicsPopulationGeographyPhysicsHabitat

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study provides theoretical stock-recruitment relationships for life cycles in which multiple, density-dependent mechanisms stemming from different periods during the life cycle act concurrently on a single demographic transition. Using graphical examples and analytical derivations, it is demonstrated that overcompensatory density dependence emerges from such life cycles despite the initial assumption that density-dependent mechanisms follow simple compensatory Beverton-Holt dynamics. These results indicate that concurrent demographic effects of temporally distinct density-dependent mechanisms provide a biologically plausible basis for empirically derived, three-parameter stock-recruitment models. This theory is inspired by, and may be most applicable to, spawner-recruit relationships in anadromous salmonids but may also inform analysis of stock and recruitment data for other taxa that putatively compete for both food and spawning space. Application of this theory will require the estimation of additional parameters from stock-recruitment data. Such parameters, however, have clear biological meaning and, at least theoretically, are accessible to empirical measurement. Stock-recruitment relationships analogous to those presented here may therefore facilitate the construction of models that incorporate independent empirical data and environmental covariates for populations that are currently better described by phenomenological equations and represent an important step towards models that incorporate spatial structure in populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.128
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences→Same topicMarine and fisheries research→French-language works237,207→