MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021923674 · doi:10.1142/s0219530503000223

BESSEL FUNCTIONS IN A QUANTUM-BILLIARD CONFIGURATION PROBLEM

2003· article· en· W2021923674 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalysis and Applications · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum chaos and dynamical systems
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDynamical billiardsBessel functionZero (linguistics)MathematicsUniquenessFunction (biology)Mathematical physicsQuantumMathematical analysisCylinderCombinatoricsQuantum mechanicsPhysicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In studying various quantum-billiard configurations, R. L. Liboff (J. Math. Phys.35 (1994) 2218), was led to investigate the vanishing of f(ν)=j 2ν,1 - j ν2 , where j μk is the kth positive zero of the Bessel function J μ (x). Here we show that the even more general function f α (ν)=c αν,k - c ν,k+l is increasing and vanishes once (and only once) in 0<ν<∞, provided α≥π/2 and [Formula: see text], k, l=1,2,3,…. As usual, c μn is the nth positive zero of the cylinder function C μ (x)=J μ (x) cos θ - Y μ (x) sin θ. Specialized to Liboff's case, f(ν), this yields not only the existence of a zero of f(ν) but also its uniqueness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.787
Threshold uncertainty score0.304

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it