MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021943067 · doi:10.3997/2214-4609.20142020

Effective Array of Electrical Survey for Detection of Piping Zone of Embankment

2014· article· en· W2021943067 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeophysical Methods and Applications
Canadian institutionsFuture Earth
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPipingLeveeCurrent (fluid)Upstream (networking)Downstream (manufacturing)EngineeringSafety factorMarine engineeringPoint (geometry)Foundation (evidence)Environmental scienceCivil engineeringGeotechnical engineeringMechanical engineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Piping through embankment or foundation of concrete dam has been issued as a main factor of various menaces for safe maintenance of the water facility structure. In this study, a new approach to find the location of the piping point by geoelectrical method is proposed. Our approach is to install the current line source in the water of upstream and downstream, and then let the current flow from upstream to downstream area. The potential will be measured at downstream to find any electrical anomalies due to piping condition. Numerical study made it possible to adjust various conditions to configure optimal configuration for successful locating of the piping point. And lab test was successfully performed and the result implied a new way of electrical application for safety assessment of water facility structure for the piping problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.319
Threshold uncertainty score0.221

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it