MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021947808 · doi:10.1117/1.oe.53.7.074113

Carrier-removal method for fringe projection profilometry based on radial basis function interpolation

2014· article· en· W2021947808 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOptical Engineering · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOptical measurement and interference techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZernike polynomialsProjection (relational algebra)Interpolation (computer graphics)Structured-light 3D scannerRadial basis functionComputer scienceOpticsBasis (linear algebra)ProfilometerLinear interpolationAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceMathematicsImage (mathematics)Materials sciencePattern recognition (psychology)PhysicsWavefrontGeometryArtificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In fringe projection profilometry, carrier removal is required to obtain the absolute height information of the tested object. We propose using radial basis function interpolation methods, due to their good approximation properties, to accurately remove the carrier phase. We evaluate the proposed method on a simulated fringe projection pattern with a nonlinear carrier and two experimentally obtained fringe projection patterns, respectively. The performance of the proposed method is compared to those of the widely used least-squares method and recent Zernike polynomial fitting method. Experimental results show that the proposed method has an improved performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score0.577

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it