MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021980485 · doi:10.1063/1.2713995

X-ray microdiffraction imaging of a silicon microcantilever

2007· article· en· W2021980485 on OpenAlexaff
Khosrow Hassani, Mark Sutton, A. Tkachuk, Martin V. Holt

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicForce Microscopy Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsCantileverMaterials scienceBent molecular geometrySiliconRadius of curvatureTwistCurvatureOpticsSingle crystalImage resolutionCrystal (programming language)RADIUSDiffractionCrystallographyOptoelectronicsPhysicsGeometryChemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A triple crystal x-ray topography technique with sample and analyzer mesh scans has been used to obtain micron resolution lattice orientation and strain maps of a single crystal silicon microcantilever. Both free and slightly bent states of the cantilever have been studied. The results show ∼8 mdeg twist between the cantilever and the supporting base, 0.3 m radius of anticlastic curvature, and strain on the order of −2×10−5 in the direction of surface normal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.220
Threshold uncertainty score0.432

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicForce Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207