MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Performance Evaluation of FRP Composite Deck Considering for Local Deformation Effects

2009· article· en· W2021983093 on OpenAlexaff
Pinaki Majumdar, Z. Liu, John J. Lesko, T. Cousins

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Composites for Construction · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersFederal Highway AdministrationVirginia Department of Transportation
KeywordsFibre-reinforced plasticStructural engineeringDeckPultrusionFinite element methodGirderMaterials scienceFlangeServiceability (structure)DurabilitySizingComposite materialEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We examine here the replacement of a deteriorated concrete deck in the historic Hawthorne Street Bridge in Covington, Va. with a lightweight fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) deck system (adhesively bonded pultruded tube and plate assembly) to increase the load rating of the bridge. To explore construction feasibility, serviceability, and durability of the proposed deck system, a two-bay section (9.45 by 6.7m ) of the bridge has been constructed and tested under different probable loading scenarios. Experimental results show that the response of the deck is linear elastic with no evidence of deterioration at service load level (HS-20). From global behavior of the bridge superstructure (experimental data and finite- element analysis), degree of composite action, and load distribution factors are determined. The lowest failure load ( 93.6kips or 418.1kN ) is about 4.5 times the design load ( 21.3kips or 94kN ), including dynamic allowance at HS-20. The failure mode is consistent in all loading conditions and observed to be localized under the loading patch at the top plate and top flange of the tube. In addition to global performance, local deformation behavior is also investigated using finite-element simulation. Local analysis suggests that local effects are significant and should be incorporated in design criteria. Based on parametric studies on geometric (thickness of deck components) and material variables (the degree of orthotropy in pultruded tube), a proposed framework for the sizing and material selection of cellular FRP decks is presented for future development of design guidelines for composite deck structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.329
Threshold uncertainty score0.605

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Composites for ConstructionSame topicStructural Behavior of Reinforced ConcreteFrench-language works237,207