MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021985378 · doi:10.2118/137924-ms

Controls on Mannville Coalbed Methane Production in Fort Assiniboine, Alberta

2010· article· en· W2021985378 on OpenAlexaffabout
Doug Bearinger, Monica Majcher

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Unconventional Resources and International Petroleum Conference · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsNexen (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoalbed methanePermeability (electromagnetism)Petroleum engineeringCoalGeologyCoal miningCoal fieldCretaceousMining engineeringGeographyArchaeologyPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Fort Assiniboine is a commercial Coalbed Methane field in central Alberta, Canada with over 200 multilateral horizontal wells in the Upper Cretaceous Mannville coal. The Mannville coal seams in this area are under-saturated. Therefore the reservoir's ability to dewater the coal through the fracture fabric to establish a gas phase is key to improving permeability to gas within the fracture system and thus achieving economic gas production rates. There is a wide range of production rates seen across the field. The multiple variables that affect gas production can be divided into a two main categories, wellbore parameters and reservoir parameters. Some of these variables were sufficiently straightforward to establish while other variables, such as permeability, are not as easily ascertained in a fractured coal system having multiphase flow. Field wide data was collected from core, wells, geological and geophysical mapping and production data. The information was compiled and analyzed in order to determine the major controls on gas production rates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.615
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Unconventional Resources and International Petroleum ConferenceSame topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir AnalysisFrench-language works237,207