MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021986096 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.8120

A Greenhouse Study On Growth, Yield And Anatomical Parameters Of Three Pea Cultivars: Under Different Irrigation Levels And Growth Regulators

2011· article· en· W2021986096 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
M. M. Dohuky, Caser G. Abdel, Nizek S. Khalid

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant nutrient uptake and metabolism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCultivarGreenhouseYield (engineering)IrrigationBiologyAgronomyHorticulturePlant growthMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This experiment was carried out during the fall season 2009-2010 in the vegetable greenhouse, Horticulture Department, Dohuk University. Three pea cultivars namely Local crinkle, Local Smooth and Canadian were subjected to three irrigation levels where plant irrigated whenever 25, 50 or 75% of pot available water capacity were depleted, besides plants were sprayed with either 100mgl-1 gibberellic acid (GA3), 100mgl-1 indole-3-butyric acid (IBA), 2.5gl-1 micronutrient and distilled water as a check treatment. The objective was to evaluate the cultivar performance under adequate and inadequate irrigation during flowering, pod swelling and seed filling stages to find out which is the best, particularly under moderate and severe drought, besides that we intended to evaluate the possibility extent of boosting drought resistance of these cultivars by the aid of GA3, IBA and micronutrients. The obtained results exhibited that irrigating pea plants whenever 25% 0f pot available water capacity was depleted appeared to be the paramount irrigation treatment followed by that of 50% depletion and irrigation level of 75% are not advisable. 25% irrigation level manifested the highest leaf number per plant (26.33), plant height (141.15 cm), root dry weight (0.16g), flower number per plant (6.48), individual pod fresh weight (3.56g), seed number per pod (3.47), green pod yield per plant (14.53g), weight 100 seeds (23.02g), seed fresh weight per pod (1.44g), pericarp fresh weight (2.05g), aperture length of upper leaf stomata (4.38μm), stomata length of leaf lower surface (6.23 μm), stomata aperture length of leaf lower surface (4.75 μm), smallest vessel width (3.72 μm), protein content of dry seed (25.3%), GA3 (346.63 mgkg-1 dry seeds), and IAA (4109.72 mgkg-1 dry seeds). The best plant response was confined to these sprayed with micronutrient, then IBA and the lowest was GA3-treated pea. Pea sprayed by 2gl-1 micronutrients manifested the highest root dry weight (0.16g), leaf dry matter percentage (26.36%), stem dry matter percentage (35.77%), flower number per plant (6.43), pod number per plant (4.49), individual pod fresh weight (3.01g), seed number per pod (3.64), yield of fresh pods per plant (13.33g), total pod number per plant (4.11), weight of 100 seeds (23.51), fresh weight of pericarp (1.6g), stomata length at upper leaf surface (6.05μm), stomata length at lower leaf surface (6.6 μm), stomata width at lower leaf surface (3.78 μm), stomata aperture length at lower leaf surface (4.61 μm), stomata aperture width at lower leaf surface (2.38 μm), stomata population at lower and upper leaf surface (5971.88 and 3792.19 stomata mm-2, respectively), chlorophyll percentage out of gross pigments (40.05%), proline content (0.0062 μgg-1 dry seeds), ABA (713.31 mgkg-1 dry seeds) and IAA (3725.23 mgkg-1 dry seeds). Crinkle pea appeared to be the potent cultivar it gave the highest yield of green pod (14.6 gplant-1), plant height (119.8cm), leaf dry weight (0.27g), root dry weight (0.25g), leaf dry mater percentage (28.79%), stem dry matter percentage (36.39%), flower number (6.75), pod number per plant (4.62), individual pod dry weight (1.21g), pod fresh weight (2.72g), seed number per pod (2.95), pericap fresh weight (1.51g), dry pericarp (0.57g), upper leaf surface stomata width (3.7μm), upper leaf surface stomata length (6 μm), stomata aperture length of upper leaf surface (4.32 μm), stomata aperture width of upper leaf surface (2.2 μm), aperture length of lower leaf surface stomata (4.64 μm), aperture width of lower leaf surface stomata (2.32 μm), stomata length at lower leaf surface (6.4 μm), stomata width at lower leaf surface (3.96 μm), the widest and lowest vessels width (10.37 and 3.8μm, respectively), vessels number per bundle (12.46) and chlorophyll percentage related to gross pigments (34.74%). Local smooth comes next then the worst cultivar was Canadian. Therefore, crinkle was most drought resistant pea cultivar.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.131 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicPlant nutrient uptake and metabolismFrench-language works237,207