MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021991451 · doi:10.1021/la0505972

Formation of Titania Nanofibers:  A Direct Sol−Gel Route in Supercritical CO<sub>2</sub>

2005· article· en· W2021991451 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLangmuir · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicCatalysis and Oxidation Reactions
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNanofiberSupercritical fluidChemical engineeringCalcinationPhysisorptionHigh-resolution transmission electron microscopyAnataseMaterials scienceSol-gelRutileElectrospinningNanotechnologyPhotocatalysisChemistryCatalysisOrganic chemistryTransmission electron microscopyComposite materialPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this letter, we present a new method to synthesize titania nanofibers with nanocrystallites via a sol-gel route in supercritical CO2. The nanofibers were formed by the esterification and condensation of titanium alkoxides using acetic acid as the polymerization agent in supercritical CO2 from 40 to 70 degrees C and 2500 to 8000 psia. The TiO2 nanofiber morphology was characterized by means of SEM and HRTEM, which indicated that the diameters ranged from 9 to 100 nm. N2 physisorption, and powder XRD showed that the nanofibers exhibited relatively high surface areas up to 400 m2/g and anatase and/or rutile nanocrystallites were formed after calcination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.288

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it