MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021999669 · doi:10.1115/ipc2010-31382

Integrating ILI Data With Publicly Available Mapping Solutions

2010· article· en· W2021999669 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications
Canadian institutionsCalgary Laboratory Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer sciencePipeline (software)Inertial measurement unitField (mathematics)Geographic coordinate systemSpatial analysisData miningInformation retrievalData scienceRemote sensingComputer visionGeographyCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Today’s’ high resolution ILI tools often incorporate extremely accurate Inertial Mapping Units (IMU) which provide spatial coordinates for every feature within a pipeline. This data may be useful across many levels of an organisation and so it is important to make the information available and practical. Google provides two near universally available mapping packages that may be easily leveraged to display GIS style data while in the field or in the office; Google Maps™ displays 2D information, while Google Earth™ provides 3D viewing. This paper presents several case studies where the use of Google Earth imagery combined with high resolution; inertially mapped MFL data provides immediate value to the pipeline operator.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.829
Threshold uncertainty score0.744

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topic3D Modeling in Geospatial ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207