MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2022027184 · doi:10.2118/170177-ms

SAGD Vacuum Insulated Tubing vs. Bare Tubing – Concentric and Eccentric Configurations: A Comparative Thermal Computational Fluid Dynamics Study

2014· article· en· W2022027184 on OpenAlexaff
Shashank K. Karra, Mike Chudiak, Apoorv Sinha, Boser Greg

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Heavy Oil Conference-Canada · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOil and Gas Production Techniques
Canadian institutionsAnsys (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInjectorCasingConcentricTube (container)MechanicsHeat transferMechanical engineeringMaterials scienceComputational fluid dynamicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In a typical injector string in SAGD operation, steam is injected through tubing placed inside a casing. Heat losses through the string and casing can result in lower quality steam being injected into the formation, and hence reduce the productivity of a SAGD operation. An ideal SAGD operation would be one where no heat losses happen inside the tubing and all the latent heat is released inside the formation to heat up the heavy oil. Several methods have been used to reduce heat losses in the injector tubing. One of the methods is the usage of a vacuum insulated tubing (VIT) placed inside the casing. VIT consists of specially manufactured tubing with a getter coating to maintain vacuum between ID and the OD of the tube. This helps in preventing heat losses compared to normal bare steel tubing. In an effort to demonstrate the benefits of VIT compared to bare tubing injector string, a comparative 3D Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) study was carried out. The objective of the study is to provide a comparison of heat loss in both VIT and bare tubing concentric and eccentric configurations. The simulation accounts for frictional and heat losses throughout the tubing and most importantly, condensation of steam inside the tubing as result of heat loss. The consideration of condensation inside the tubing is a critical component of the simulation as it in turn affects the heat loss through the tubing. The other significant aspect of the study is the consideration of eccentric and concentric placement of tubing string inside the casing and its effect on heat loss. This study uses an Euler-Euler Multiphase flow based approach which accounts for the fluid-fluid interactions such as drag, turbulent dispersion etc. between steam and water inside the tubing. The thermal phase change model in ANSYS CFD accounts for the condensation of steam into water. The computed results successfully demonstrate the benefits of vacuum insulated tubing over bare tubing in maintaining steam quality in the vertical section of the wellbore. Also, the study shows reduction in steam quality for eccentric position of the bare tubing compared to concentric position. Most importantly this study demonstrates the capability of CFD to solve industrial scale complex problems and provide engineers with an insight into some of the challenging physics associated with a SAGD operation in the field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Heavy Oil Conference-CanadaSame topicOil and Gas Production TechniquesFrench-language works237,207