Attenuated Total Reflection Infrared Spectroscopy: An Efficient Technique to Quantitatively Determine the Orientation and Conformation of Proteins in Single Silk Fibers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Polarized attenuated total reflection (ATR) infrared spectroscopy is an efficient technique to determine the orientation and conformation of a large variety of samples, but it is more difficult to apply to very small specimens such as silk fibers. The Golden Gate single-reflection ATR accessory that uses diamond as an ATR element and a focalized beam turns out to be highly efficient to study quantitatively the orientation and conformation of a single silk fibroin filament of the silkworm Bombyx mori that is about 10 mum in diameter. For orientation measurements, rotating the sample instead of the electric field greatly simplifies the theoretical analysis and keeps the penetration depth of the infrared radiation constant. A sample holder that can be fitted on the ATR accessory has thus been developed to allow accurate rotation of the sample and to obtain spectra with a low, non-damaging, and reproducible pressure on the fiber. To validate the method, spectra have been recorded as a function of the angle theta between the fiber axis and the polarization of the incident radiation. The data have been fitted following the cosine square dependency of the absorbance with respect to the angle theta. The procedure has been applied to the spectral components of the amide I bands, as determined from spectral decomposition. Multiple angle measurements turn out to be quite useful to correct systematic angle errors and validate the accuracy of the curve-fitting parameters of the band decomposition. By using the calculated dichroic ratio, a parameter of -0.46+/-0.01 has been calculated for the antiparallel beta-sheets and -0.04+/-0.02 for the remaining structures. From the orientation-insensitive spectrum A0, the amount of beta-sheets has been estimated to 49+/-3%. The results obtained from only two measurements with the electric field of the incident radiation parallel and perpendicular to the fiber axis has demonstrated that ATR spectroscopy can be used routinely in quantitative studies of the molecular orientation and conformation of macromolecules.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".