Overtone-Induced Decarboxylation: A Potential Sink for Atmospheric Diacids
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Atmospheric photochemistry induced by solar excitation of vibrational overtone transitions has recently been demonstrated to be of importance in cleaving weak bonds (in HO(2)NO(2)) and inducing intramolecular rearrangement followed by reaction (in H(2)SO(4)). Here, we propose another potentially important process: the decarboxylation of organic acids. To demonstrate this possibility, we have calculated the decarboxylation pathways for malonic acid and its monohydrate. The barrier to the gas-phase decarboxylation was calculated to be in the range 26-28 kcal/mol at the B3LYP/6-311++G(3df,3pd) level of theory, in good agreement with previous results. The transition state is a six-membered ring structure which is accessed via concerted O-H and C-C stretches; excitation of v(OH) > or = 3 of either one of the OH stretching modes is sufficient to supply the energy needed for the decarboxylation. A low-energy isomer of the malonic acid-water complex forms an eight-membered, multiply hydrogen bonded structure, bound by 3-6 kcal/mol, somewhat less stable than the lowest energy, six-membered ring isomer. Decarboxylation of such complexes uses water as a catalyst; the water accepts an acidic proton from one malonic acid group and transfers a proton to the carbonyl of the other acid group. The barrier for this process is 20-22 kcal/mol, suggesting that complexes excited to v(OH) > or = 2 possess sufficient energy to react. Using estimated absorption cross sections for the OH overtone transitions, we suggest that the overtone-induced decarboxylation of malonic acid and its water complex is competitive with wet deposition of the acid and with gas-phase reaction with OH for removal of the acid.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".