MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2022047477 · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/55/6/001

Temperature change near microbubbles within a capillary network during focused ultrasound

2010· article· en· W2022047477 on OpenAlexaff
Alexander Klotz, Liis Lindvere, Bojana Stefanovic, Kullervo Hynynen

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics in Medicine and Biology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMcGill UniversityHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science Centre
FundersNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
KeywordsMaterials scienceBubbleBioheat transferMicrobubblesUltrasoundThermocoupleBiomedical engineeringCapillary actionAbsorption (acoustics)Heat transferTemperature measurementMechanicsAcousticsThermodynamicsComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Preformed gas bubbles can increase energy absorption from an ultrasound beam and therefore they have been proposed for an enhancer of ultrasound treatments. Although tissue temperature measurements performed in vivo using invasive thermocouple probes and MRI thermometry have demonstrated increased tissue temperature, the microscopic temperature distribution has not been investigated so far. In this study the transfer of heat between bubbles and tissue during focused ultrasound was simulated. Microbubble oscillations were simulated within a rat cortical microvascular network reconstructed from in vivo dual-photon microscopy images and the power density of these oscillations was used as an input term in the Pennes bioheat transfer equation. The temperature solution from the bioheat transfer equation was mapped onto vascular data to produce a three-dimensional temperature map. The results showed high temperatures near the bubbles and slow temperature rise in the tissue. Heating was shown to increase with increasing bubble frequency and insonation pressure, and showed a frequency-dependent peak. The goal of this research is to characterize the effect of various parameters on bubble-enhanced therapeutic ultrasound to allow better treatment planning. These results show that the induced temperature elevations have nonuniformities which may have a significant impact on the bio-effects of the exposure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.844
Threshold uncertainty score0.395

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics in Medicine and BiologySame topicUltrasound and Hyperthermia ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207