MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Unexpected posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus in patients treated with rFVIIa

2006· article· en· W2022049849 on OpenAlexaff
Suresh Subramaniam, Andrew M. Demchuk, Thomas J. Watson, P. Alan Barber, Michael D. Hill

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersAmerican Society of Hematology
KeywordsMedicineIntracerebral hemorrhageAnesthesiaHematomaComplicationHydrocephalusSurgeryStroke (engine)Glasgow Coma Scale

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One-third of patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) are dead within 1 month of symptom onset, and only 20% regain functional independence.1 In a recent Phase IIB study, recombinant Factor VIIa (rFVIIa) given within 4 hours after the onset of ICH significantly reduced hematoma growth and improved clinical outcomes; this effect is being evaluated in a Phase III trial.2 Enthusiasm for the use of rFVIIa is tempered by safety concerns. An increased frequency of thromboembolic complications, notably arterial ischemic events, among patients with ICH treated with rFVIIa has been observed. We report our open-label experience with rFVIIa used within an institution-approved protocol and the occurrence of posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus as an unexpected complication. rFVIIa was administered at a dose of 40 μg/kg body weight to nine patients with ICH diagnosed by CT scan within 3 hours from symptom onset. The inclusion and exclusion criteria for administration of rFVIIa were …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurologySame topicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ResearchFrench-language works237,207