Influence of Ventriculoatrial Timing on Hemodynamics and Symptoms During Supraventricular Tachycardia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: Patients with reentrant supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) are often highly symptomatic and the mechanism of symptoms is not well understood. We hypothesized that variation in ventriculoatrial interval (QRS to P) modulates the left atrial pressure and symptoms during tachycardia. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-six patients awaiting electrophysiological study completed a questionnaire regarding "neck pounding" or "shirt flapping" during tachycardia. Mean left atrial pressure was measured during simulated atrioventricular reentry tachycardia (AVRT) and atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) in 18 patients. Pulmonary venous flow reversal was assessed using transesophageal echocardiography in 12 dogs when pacing at 220 bpm with different VA delays (0 to 250 ms). "Shirt flapping" is present more often during AVNRT than during AVRT (58.6% vs 43.8%, respectively, P < 0.05). Simulated AVNRT is associated with higher left atrial pressure compared with AVRT (19.4 +/- 4.8 mmHg vs 13.7 +/- 3.9 mmHg, respectively, P < 0.05). In dogs, pulmonary venous flow reversal during atrial systole was observed with significantly decreasing amplitude as VA delays increased: 668 +/- 167% at 0 ms; 492 +/- 138% at 100 ms; 278 +/- 148% at 180/ms; and 134 +/- 91% at 220 ms. CONCLUSION: "Shirt flapping" and "neck pounding" frequently occur during AVNRT. LA contractions during AV valve closure increase left atrial pressure and may explain differences in certain symptoms between AVNRT and AVRT.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".