A PCM/heat pipe cooling system for reducing air conditioning in buildings: review of options and report on field tests
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Air conditioning is now seen as a new and major contributor to CO 2 emissions in the UK. This is partly due to global warming and partly to the increased use of IT systems. A novel system for reducing or eliminating the need for air conditioning was developed to the proof-of-concept stage under an earlier project at the University of Nottingham. The system makes use of heat pipes to transfer heat into and out of a phase change material which is ‘frozen’ during the night and ‘melted’ during the day. This paper describes a number of concepts for ‘free cooling’, and the background to the current concept, before detailing field tests on the system that have recently been completed and which demonstrate its effectiveness under real operating conditions. Systems were installed in two offices and detailed monitoring of their performance was carried out during the summer months. On the basis of the results obtained it is concluded that the system functions very well and is practically and technically the most attractive of the available alternatives to air conditioning. The fact that it is suited to retrofitting in existing buildings means that both the potential market and the CO 2 reductions are large. Practical application: The paper describes a novel system that is intended to provide passive cooling in naturally ventilated buildings. The novelty lies in the use of heat pipes and a fan to enhance the heat transfer to and from the phase change material (PCM) and the air. That this has been successful is shown by the ability of the system to exercise a degree of control over the room air temperature that is comparable to that of a conventional airconditioning system. The review provided in the paper may also be of use to other workers on PCMs and night cooling of naturally ventilated buildings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".