MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2022097871 · doi:10.5539/apr.v5n2p63

The Forzon and the Space Energy

2013· article· en· W2022097871 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
D. S. Acosta

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCosmology and Gravitation Theories
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsDark energyClassical mechanicsDark matterInertiaGravitationZero-energy universeImpulse (physics)Negative massUniverseMetric expansion of spaceAstrophysicsCosmology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Forzon, is the primordial particle from which have been built all the physical particles, i.e. all the matter and energy. This particle is the cause of impulse and has a motor allowing its displacement through space at the speed of light consuming its inner energy. In this manner, the Forzon is the cause of the mass of all the particles, including the ones known as particles without mass. The exact way in which the forzon produced inertia has been described in the omnidirectional impulses system (OIS) theory. The present work aimed to explain the way in which the Forzon obtains its energy in space and in which form this energy is found in the vacuum space in order for the Forzon to use it; simultaneously being the origin of other manifestations, as the universe expansion, the dark matter ,dark energy, gravitation and the electromagnetic fields. All of these lead to a model of a fluid universe where the time, is the base of the matter and energy, and also the space evacuator.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.006
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics ResearchSame topicCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesFrench-language works237,207