MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2022104662 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.65.180103

CuCN: An orientational glass

2002· article· en· W2022104662 on OpenAlexafffund
J. Wang, M. F. Collins, G. P. Johari

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B, Condensed matter · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMaterial Dynamics and Properties
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcMaster University
KeywordsMonoclinic crystal systemOrthorhombic crystal systemMaterials scienceCrystallographyCrystal (programming language)Phase (matter)CrystallizationAtmospheric temperature rangeCrystal structurePhysicsCondensed matter physicsThermodynamicsChemistryQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rhombohedral crystal phase of CuCN forms irreversibly on heating a mixture of its orthorhombic and monoclinic phases to 593 K. In its space group, $R3m$ $(a=b=0.6026 \mathrm{nm},$ $c=0.4823 \mathrm{nm},$ $\ensuremath{\alpha}=\ensuremath{\beta}=90\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{},$ $\ensuremath{\gamma}=120\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{},$ $Z=3,$ ${V}_{0}=0.1516 {\mathrm{nm}}^{3},$ and ${D}_{x}=2.94 {\mathrm{g}/\mathrm{c}\mathrm{m}}^{3}),$ positions of C and N atoms are disordered, and therefore orientations of the CN group in the (N-Cu-C) chain structure are random. Its heat capacity increases in the manner of a sigmoid shape over the 350--380 K range, analogous to that observed on kinetic unfreezing of a canonical glass, as does that of a mixture of crystal phases obtained by flocculation process. The CuCN phase appears as the simplest orientational glass whose state is trapped in a deep minimum with a corrugated bottom, and each corrugation corresponding to one configurational excitation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.668
Threshold uncertainty score0.987

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B, Condensed matterSame topicMaterial Dynamics and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207