Nontuberculous mycobacterial hypersensitivity pneumonitis related to a home shower: treatment and secondary prevention
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 57-year-old physician with increasing dyspnoea and hypoxaemia had a high-resolution CT scan of the chest, which disclosed diffuse pulmonary ground glass opacities, more pronounced in the upper lobes with minimal mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Transbronchial biopsy of the right middle and lower lobes was performed, demonstrating varying degrees of well circumscribed organising granulomatous pneumonitis thought to be most consistent with hypersensitivity to nontuberculous mycobacteria. Cultures of water obtained from the patient's home shower were positive for Mycobacterium avium complex. The patient began substituting baths for showers, experiencing some gradual improvement of his symptoms. Subsequently, he installed point-of-use 0.2 micron membrane filters on his shower, and resumed regular showering after installation with continued symptomatic improvement. CT scans at 3 and 18 months revealed improvement and resolution, respectively. Four years later, he continues to shower in filtered home shower water and remains clinically well.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".