MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Iron-regulated phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase activity in<i>Azotobacter vinelandii</i>

2003· article· en· W2022179869 on OpenAlexafffund
William Page, Manisha Mehrotra, M. Vande Woestyne, Anne E. Tindale, Sonya L. Kujat Choy, Andrea S Macyk, Brenda K. Leskiw

Bibliographic record

VenueFEMS Microbiology Letters · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAzotobacter vinelandiiMutantBiologyGeneMutagenesisPlasmidStrain (injury)Reporter geneMutationDNAGeneticsMolecular biologyGene expressionBacteriaNitrogenaseNitrogen fixation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Azotobacter vinelandii strain UA22 was produced by pTn5luxAB mutagenesis, such that the promoterless luxAB genes were transcribed in an iron-repressible manner. Tn5luxAB was localized to a fragment of chromosomal DNA encoding the thrS, infC, rpmI, rplT, pheS and pheT genes, with Tn5 inserted in the 3'-end of pheS. The isolation of this mutation in an essential gene was possible because of polyploidy in Azotobacter, such that strain UA22 carried both wild-type and mutant alleles of pheS. Phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase activity and PHES::luxAB reporter activity was partially repressed under iron-sufficient conditions and fully derepressed under iron-limited conditions. The ferric uptake regulator (Fur) bound to a DNA sequence immediately upstream of luxAB, within the pheS gene, but PHES::luxAB reporter activity was not affected by phenylalanine availability. This suggests there is novel regulation of pheST in A. vinelandii by iron availability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFEMS Microbiology LettersSame topicRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsFrench-language works237,207