MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2022184081 · doi:10.4310/cis.2008.v8.n4.a2

A Geometric Framework for Stabilization by Energy Shaping: Sufficient Conditions for Existence of Solutions

2008· article· en· W2022184081 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications in Information and Systems · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicControl and Stability of Dynamical Systems
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMechanical systemHamiltonian systemHamiltonian (control theory)MathematicsControl theory (sociology)Mechanical energyDifferential (mechanical device)Partial differential equationOrdinary differential equationEnergy (signal processing)Differential equationControl (management)Computer scienceMathematical analysisMathematical optimizationPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a geometric formulation for the energy shaping problem. The central\nobjective is the initiation of a more systematic exploration of energy shaping with the aim of de-\ntermining whether a given system can be stabilized using energy shaping feedback. We investigate\nthe partial differential equations for the kinetic energy shaping problem using the formal theory of\npartial differential equations. The main contribution is sufficient conditions for integrability of these\npartial differential equations. We couple these results with the integrability results for potential\nenergy shaping. This gives some new avenues for answering key questions in energy shaping that\nhave not been addressed to this point.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.976
Threshold uncertainty score0.365

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it