MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2022185036 · doi:10.1177/155545890300600303

Can Parents Control Who Teaches Their Children?

2003· article· en· W2022185036 on OpenAlexaff
Kurtis Hewson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cases in Educational Leadership · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicParental Involvement in Education
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyPerceptionQuality (philosophy)PedagogyTeacher qualityIdeal (ethics)Teacher leadershipControl (management)Teacher educationEducational leadershipPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This case examines a number of key issues pertaining to teacher quality and parental involvement in schools, particularly schools that serve culturally distinct areas. It explores the support given to beginning teachers by administrators, colleagues and community, and the role of teacher evaluation. It also considers the perception of teacher demeanor within a community, the public ideal of what a teacher should represent and embody. This case can be used to examine positive and negative aspects of parental involvement in schools, the correlation between teacher quality and student learning and beginning teacher support.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.206
Threshold uncertainty score0.480

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.137
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cases in Educational LeadershipSame topicParental Involvement in EducationFrench-language works237,207