Shear strength, interparticle locking, and dilatancy of granular materials
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effect of particle angularity on the strength and dilation of granular materials is investigated through a series of laboratory tests on two materials, Ottawa standard sand (Sand O) and crushed limestone (Sand L), that are made up of rounded and angular particles, respectively. Triaxial tests on both materials at different confining pressures and initial void ratios show that particle angularity has a substantial effect on both the peak friction angle ϕ p and the mobilized friction angle at the onset of dilation, ϕ f . It is found that ϕ f is smaller than the critical friction angle ϕ cv for Ottawa sand; nevertheless ϕ f is larger than ϕ cv for Sand L owing to interparticle locking induced by particle angularity. The experimental results clearly show the contributions to shear resistance from both dilation and interlocking, with interlocking still largely existing at the peak stress ratio but not at the critical state. Suggestions are made to modify the stress–dilatancy formulations for sand to take into account the effect of interparticle locking associated with particle angularity.Key words: granular material, dilatancy, interlocking, and particle shape.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it