MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2022222304 · doi:10.4000/vertigo.4575

Écotourisme et développement durable

2003· article· fr· W2022222304 on OpenAlex
Jonathan Tardif

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueVertigO · 2003
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiverse Aspects of Tourism Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Depuis la parution du rapport Bruntland en 1987, le concept de " développement durable " a fait du chemin. Malgré son ambiguïté, on cherche des outils pour le mettre en oeuvre. En raison de sa dépendance au milieu naturel et de l'importance de ce marché, l'écotourisme attire l'attention de nombreux chercheurs. Cependant, il n'y a pas consensus sur le sens des principes qui lui sont associés, en plus d'être souvent confondu avec d'autres formes de tourisme. Pratiqué dans des aires protégées parfois éloignées des grands centres urbains, les impacts environnementaux, socioculturels et économiques de l'écotourisme ne sont pas insignifiants. Étant donné la complexité inhérente à ce domaine, la recherche gagnerait à se structurer autour d'un cadre théorique plus fort et à croiser différents types de données.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.649
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it