MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2022224303 · doi:10.5539/apr.v7n3p69

How and Why the Universe Is Natural

2015· article· en· W2022224303 on OpenAlex
Jacques Consiglio

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsLarge Hadron ColliderParticle physicsScalar fieldNeutrinoScalar (mathematics)Field (mathematics)BosonUniverseQuarkMass spectrumQuadratic equationQuantum electrodynamicsTheoretical physicsMathematical physicsQuantum mechanicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In previous paper, we showed that the elementary particles mass spectrum can be computed from theory using a resonance equation. The predicted H0 mass agrees with the latest CERN publications. As a result, the H0 acquires its mass exactly in the same geometry as the Z0 and the W±; it is not a “purely scalar boson” and then quadratic divergences are inexistent. In this paper, we find an underlying structure of the field with 19 pure states, where 36 quark states (including color) and 3 or 6 neutrinos states are mixtures, and we show that the CKM and PMNS matrices elements come from the equation and the field structure. We conclude that the field is natural since over the 23 SM parameters, at least 19 are fully constrained by the field structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.191
Threshold uncertainty score0.284

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it