MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2022282779 · doi:10.1504/ijor.2014.060416

Supply chain contracting with product substitution and partial vertical integration

2014· article· en· W2022282779 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Operational Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSupply Chain and Inventory Management
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupply chainStockoutBusinessVendor-managed inventoryVendorProfit (economics)Industrial organizationStock (firearms)Supply chain managementContext (archaeology)MicroeconomicsMarketingEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Retailers stock products from competing manufacturers and a stockout of one product may cause a proportion of unsatisfied demand to be transferred to another good. Depending on the market power of the retailer, consumer demand may be at constant prices or represented by downward sloping demand curves. Retail inventory may be managed by the retailer (RMI) or by the vendor (VMI). These possibilities are considered for various supply chain configurations including independent suppliers and a vertically integrated ‘store brand’. The results are compared with theoretical and empirical findings from the literature. We find that the choice of supply chain structure and the type of integration selected by the retailer have a significant impact on the overall performance of the supply chain. Retailers prefer VMI and suppliers would prefer RMI as it maximises their own profit. In this context, it is important to recognise the significant agency costs associated with these supply chains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.916
Threshold uncertainty score0.654

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it