MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Stability of Three Different Galenic Liquid Formulations Compounded from Tablet Containing Glibenclamide

2013· article· en· W2022287465 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ugo Di Folco, Daniela De Falco, Fabio Marcucci, Graziella Nobili, Vincenzo Moretti, Claudio Tubili

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nutritional Therapeutics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic function and diabetes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlibenclamideSulfonylureaPharmacologyChromatographyMedicineChemistryMedical prescriptionDoseDiabetes mellitusEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The suspensions of sulfonylurea glyburide (glibenclamide) are compounded extemporaneously for patients suffering from transitional and Permanent Neonatal Diabetes mellitus (PND). The purpose of this study is to compare the stability of three different galenic liquid formulations compounded from tablet containing glibenclamide. The samples were stored at refrigerated (2-8°C) and room temperature and analyzed at different times. All formulations analysed are stable for at least 90 days, but only two guarantee the administration responding to prescription, especially when it comes to giving dosages very small.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.678
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Nutritional TherapeuticsSame topicPancreatic function and diabetesFrench-language works237,207