Structural and magnetic characterization of multiferroic<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>BiFeO</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>PbTiO</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>solid solutions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A series of multiferroic $(1\ensuremath{-}x){\text{BiFeO}}_{3}\ensuremath{-}x{\text{PbTiO}}_{3}$ solid solution ceramics were prepared by solid-state reactions. Structural characterization by x-ray diffraction reveals the existence of a morphotropic phase boundary (MPB) region in this system in which a tetragonal, a rhombohedral, and an orthorhombic phase exist simultaneously with a large tetragonality in the tetragonal phase region. The temperature variation of magnetic moment of the samples with MPB compositions, measured under zero-field cooling (ZFC) mode, shows three anomalies arising from the antiferromagnetic orderings of the rhombohedral, tetragonal, and orthorhombic phases, respectively. The significant difference in antiferromagnetic ordering temperatures of the rhombohedral and tetragonal phases is attributed to the different structural effects on the magnetic interactions between the rhombohedral and the tetragonal phases, and the effect of the magnetic dilution on the magnetic ordering strength. The magnetic phase diagram of the $(1\ensuremath{-}x){\text{BiFeO}}_{3}\ensuremath{-}x{\text{PbTiO}}_{3}$ solid solution system was established.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".