MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2022320366 · doi:10.1080/00981380109517019

Delivering health care services in the community: A multidisciplinary perspective

2001· article· en· W2022320366 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ron Levin, Margot Herbert

Bibliographic record

VenueSocial Work in Health Care · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicInterprofessional Education and Collaboration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultidisciplinary approachSocial workPerspective (graphical)NursingHealth careWork (physics)PerceptionMedicinePsychologyMedical educationSociologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Canadian health care system has shifted away from its traditional emphasis on acute care in-patient services, to increasing dependence on community-based services. A major implication is that education for work in this new environment will need to be reconceptualized, and those already in the system will have to examine their assumptions and alter their approach to patient care. This paper reports the results of a study which examines the attitudes, educational preparation, skills sets, and perceptions of "community" among social workers, occupational therapists, nurses and physiotherapists. The results should inform social work and other health educators about relevant theoretical and practical preparation for work in an environment which increasingly emphasizes multiple skills, community partnerships and coordinated care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.189

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0200.012
Scholarly communication0.0110.006
Open science0.0020.008
Research integrity0.0070.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.487
Teacher spread0.444 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSocial Work in Health CareSame topicInterprofessional Education and CollaborationFrench-language works237,207