Thermodynamic properties of chloramine formation and related reactions during water treatment: A G4MP2, G4, and W1BD theoretical study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A high-level gas and aqueous phase theoretical thermodynamic study was conducted on the primary and related chemical reactions which occur during chloramination for water treatment using the G4MP2, G4, and W1BD composite methods with the SMD, PCM, and CPCM solvation models. The standard state (298.15 K, 1 atm or 1M) formation of mono-, di-, and tri-chloramines from their precursors via hypochlorous acid chlorination is substantially exothermic and exergonic in both the gas and aqueous phases. The excellent agreement between experimental and theoretical values for a range of structural and thermodynamic calculations on a suite of calibration compounds suggests that the G4MP2, G4, and W1BD calculations meet or exceed criteria for thermochemical accuracy. The temperature influence on the thermodynamics of chloramine formation is projected to be negligible regardless of phase between 0 and 100°C. Additional thermodynamic calculations were undertaken on associated chloramination reactions involving the disproportionation of monochloramine, the decomposition of di- and tri-chloramine, and the reactions of trichloramine with ammonia and dichloramine. The results from these investigations not only provide a better understanding of the reaction thermodynamics, they also allow for a more rigorous interpretation of proposed chloramination mechanisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".